REFSQ 2026
Mon 23 - Thu 26 March 2026 Poznań, Poland

About

Requirements Engineering (RE) is a process that can highly affect the quality of software, systems, and services. The REFSQ working conference series is well established as one of the leading international forums for discussing RE and its many relations to quality. REFSQ 2026 includes a track to present posters and demonstrate tools covering any aspect of RE. This track gives researchers and practitioners the chance to present their most recent work and obtain early feedback from the conference participants.

Dates
Tracks
Plenary

This program is tentative and subject to change.

You're viewing the program in a time zone which is different from your device's time zone change time zone

Tue 24 Mar

Displayed time zone: Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna change

08:00 - 09:00
RegistrationResearch Track at CW 3
09:00 - 10:30
09:00
15m
Day opening
Opening
Research Track
Sylwia Kopczyńska Poznan University of Technology
09:15
75m
Keynote
Keynote 1
Research Track
Tony Gorschek Blekinge Institute of Technology / DocEngineering
10:30 - 11:00
Coffee breakCatering at CW 053
11:00 - 11:15
Poster PitchesPosters & Tools at CW 3
14:00 - 15:40
Trustworthiness in AI and Information SystemsResearch Track at CW 3
14:00
30m
Technical design
Fairness as a First-Class Requirement: A Fairness Hazard Analysis Approach to Socio-Technical ProcessesTechnical Design Paper
Research Track
Giovanna Broccia ISTI-CNR, FMT Lab, Lucio Lelii , Roberto Cirillo , Dario Di Dario University of Salerno, Samuel Fricker FHNW, Fabio Palomba University of Salerno, Giorgio Spagnolo ISTI-CNR, FMT Lab, Alessio Ferrari CNR-ISTI
14:30
30m
Scientific evaluation
Supporting Stakeholder Requirements Expression with LLM Revisions: An Empirical EvaluationScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Michael Mircea , Emre Gevrek , Elisa Schmid Leibniz Universität Hannover, Kurt Schneider Leibniz Universität Hannover, Software Engineering Group
15:00
20m
Research preview
Specifying and Validating Fairness & Transparency Requirements for AI-Based Social Benefit Allocation in Digital GovernmentResearch Preview Paper
Research Track
Amanda Aline Figueiredo Carvalho Vicenzi , José Siqueira de Cerqueira Tampere University, Edna Dias Canedo Computer Science Department - University of Brasília, Pekka Abrahamsson University of Jyväskylä
15:20
20m
Research preview
Embedding Normative Requirements in Fuzzy LogicResearch Preview Paper
Research Track
Ziba Assadi , Paola Inverardi Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI)
14:00 - 15:30
LLMs use in REResearch Track at CW 8
14:00
30m
Scientific evaluation
Opportunities and Limitations of GenAI in RE: Viewpoints from PracticeScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Anne Hess Technical University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Andreas Vogelsang paluno – The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Xavier Franch Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Andrea Herrmann Herrmann & Ehrlich, Sylwia Kopczyńska Poznan University of Technology, Alexander Rachmann Hochschule Niederrhein
14:30
30m
Scientific evaluation
A Comparative Study of Large and Small Language Models for Conceptual Model ExtractionScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Cheng Yi Chou , Fatma Başak Aydemir Utrecht University, Fabiano Dalpiaz Utrecht University
15:00
30m
Scientific evaluation
From Online User Feedback to Requirements: Evaluating Large Language Models for Classification and Specification TasksScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Manjeshwar Mallaya , Alessio Ferrari CNR-ISTI, Mohammad Amin Zadenoori ISTI-CNR, Jacek Dąbrowski Lero - the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software
Pre-print
16:10 - 17:30
Panel: Trustworthy and Ethical Systems via Requirements Engineering Research Track at CW 3

Thu 26 Mar

Displayed time zone: Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna change

09:00 - 10:15
09:00
75m
Keynote
Keynote 2
Research Track
Pınar Yolum Utrecht University
10:45 - 12:25
Requirements Specification and Privacy by DesignResearch Track at CW 3
10:45
30m
Technical design
An Industry-Driven Template for the Documentation of Non-Functional RequirementsTechnical Design Paper
Research Track
Sabine Molenaar Utrecht University, Fabiano Dalpiaz Utrecht University
11:15
30m
Technical design
FeClustRE: Hierarchical Clustering and Semantic Tagging of App Features from User ReviewsTechnical Design Paper
Research Track
Max Tiessler Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Quim Motger Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Pre-print
11:45
20m
Research preview
Eliciting and Ingraining Cultural Elements in Digital Information Systems with CEFISResearch Preview Paper
Research Track
12:05
20m
Research preview
Towards a Goal-Centric Assessment of Requirements Engineering Methods for Privacy by DesignResearch Preview Paper
Research Track
Oleksandr Kosenkov Blekinge Institute of Technology, Ehsan Zabardast Nordea / Blekinge Institute of Technology, Jannik Fischbach Netlight Consulting GmbH and fortiss GmbH, Tony Gorschek Blekinge Institute of Technology / DocEngineering, Daniel Mendez Blekinge Institute of Technology and fortiss
10:45 - 12:05
Formal MethodsResearch Track at CW 8
10:45
30m
Technical design
Provably Relevant HAL Interface Requirements for Embedded SystemsTechnical Design Paper
Research Track
Manuel Bentele University of Freiburg, Andreas Podelski University of Freiburg, Axel Sikora , Bernd Westphal German Aerospace Center (DLR)
11:15
30m
Technical design
A practical and complete method for detecting rt-inconsistencies in real-time requirementsTechnical Design Paper
Research Track
Nico Hauff University of Freiburg, Elisabeth Henkel University Freiburg, Elisabeth Fünfgeld , Vincent Langenfeld University of Freiburg, Andreas Podelski University of Freiburg
11:45
20m
Research preview
Automata-Represented Requirements in HanforPLResearch Preview Paper
Research Track
Tobias Kolzer Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg, Vincent Langenfeld University of Freiburg, Nico Hauff University of Freiburg, Elisabeth Henkel University Freiburg, Andreas Podelski University of Freiburg
12:05 - 12:20
Best Poster PresentationPosters & Tools at CW 8
12:25 - 14:00
14:00 - 15:30
ExplainabilityResearch Track at CW 3
14:00
30m
Scientific evaluation
Immersive and Enjoyable Explanations - On Distinct Explainability Requirements in GamesScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Jakob Droste Leibniz Universität Hannover, Ronja Fuchs Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannah Deters Leibniz University Hannover, Martin Obaidi Leibniz Universität Hannover, Alexander Dockhorn University of Southern Denmark, SDU, Kurt Schneider Leibniz Universität Hannover, Software Engineering Group
14:30
30m
Scientific evaluation
Misunderstandings by Design: Using Erroneous Tutorials to Induce Mental Model Conflicts and the Need for ExplanationsScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Jakob Droste Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannah Deters Leibniz University Hannover, Carolin Kirchhoff , Lukas Nagel Leibniz Universität Hannover, Software Engineering Group, Martin Obaidi Leibniz Universität Hannover, Kurt Schneider Leibniz Universität Hannover, Software Engineering Group
15:00
30m
Scientific evaluation
All Eyes on User Needs: Using Gaze and Pupillometric Measures to Identify Explanation NeedsScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Laura Reinhardt Leibniz University Hannover, Hannah Deters Leibniz University Hannover, Jakob Droste Leibniz Universität Hannover, Kurt Schneider Leibniz Universität Hannover, Software Engineering Group
14:00 - 15:30
Software DevelopmentResearch Track at CW 8
14:00
30m
Technical design
A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Approach to Enhancing User Story Management in Agile Software DevelopmentTechnical Design Paper
Research Track
Hoang Khoa Nguyen , Malik Sami Tampere University, Zheying Zhang Tampere University, Pekka Abrahamsson Tampere University
14:30
30m
Scientific evaluation
Security under Pressure: How Agile Teams Experience and Manage Security RequirementsScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Dahlia Thaewjaturat , Oksana Kulyk IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Elda Paja IT University of Copenhagen
15:00
30m
Scientific evaluation
Understanding Usefulness in Developer Explanations on Stack OverflowScientific Evaluation Paper
Research Track
Martin Obaidi Leibniz Universität Hannover, Kushtrim Qengaj , Hannah Deters Leibniz University Hannover, Jakob Droste Leibniz Universität Hannover, Marc Herrmann Leibniz University Hannover, Kurt Schneider Leibniz Universität Hannover, Software Engineering Group, Jil Klünder University of Applied Sciences | FHDW Hannover
15:30 - 16:00

Posters

We welcome poster proposals that follow these criteria:

  • Posters should present (progress towards) a scientific result covering any topic within the scope of the REFSQ conference.

  • Posters should give a concise and engaging overview of your work to attract interest.

  • Posters do not have to describe finished work, but they should present some preliminary or anticipated results.

  • The methodology used for producing the results should be clarified and contrasted with the state-of-the-art.

  • We encourage submissions on RE-related topics that are not often covered in research papers.

  • Posters should not be advertisements for commercial products.

Submissions proposing a poster should describe the research work in the form of a short paper (see Submission below). Do not submit a draft poster with your proposal.

Poster Presentation

There will be a brief pitching of the posters, followed by a display. Well-crafted posters will be self-explanatory, but authors of posters are encouraged to be available to describe and discuss their work during coffee breaks.

The poster dimensions are A0 in portrait orientation, with the poster content mounted on a rectangular poster board that the organizers will provide.

Tools

We invite submissions proposing a tool demonstration that:

  • Present a tool under development (or that has been developed) as part of research or industrial work.

  • Clarify the relationship of the tool to RE.

  • Motivate the need for the tool.

  • Describe the goals, requirements, intended users, and context of the use of the tool.

  • Describe the novel contribution of the tool.

  • Describe the novelty of the paper over any earlier publications on the tool.

  • Clearly explain the architecture and inner workings of the tool (at least two pages).

  • Detail the workflow or interaction of a user with the tool (half a page at least).

  • Present briefly either the results of an evaluation or the design for a planned evaluation.

  • [Optional] Include a link in the abstract to a video presenting the tool’s demonstration scenario (4–8 minutes, using voice-over or captions where appropriate).

  • [Optional] Discuss any experiences and lessons learned when using the tool in practice.

Submissions proposing a tool should describe the research work in the form of a short paper (see Submission below).

Tool Demonstrations

Tools will be presented simultaneously with the posters at desks using your own laptop and screens. We recommend and support showing a poster at the conference in addition to the tool.

Best Poster & Best Tool Award

In REFSQ 2026, we follow the voting idea from the last editions:

  • The conference attendees will be asked to vote for the best poster and tool.

  • The authors of the best poster or tool will earn a reserved time slot in the main track to present their work.

  • The Program Committee will be able to nominate posters and tools to be considered for the best awards. These nominations will contribute to the final votes.

Submission

For the submission, the general REFSQ submission guidelines apply, with the exception of the format. For both posters and tool demonstrations, we accept submissions in the form of a short paper of at least five pages and up to seven pages including references, and they should be formatted using the CEUR-ART style, one column (CEUR-ART style).

At least one of the authors must be registered at the conference and present the poster or tool in order to have the work published in the proceedings. Poster and tool papers will be published in the CEUR joint proceedings of the REFSQ 2026 co-located events.

Contributions should be submitted using EasyChair at:

EasyChair REFSQ 2026

Make sure to select the Posters and Tools option.

For any questions, feel free to contact us via email: REFSQ26_PT@easychair.org

Important dates

  • 26 Jan 2026 - Papers Submissions
  • 13 Feb 2026 - Author’s notification
  • 25 Feb 2026 - Camera-ready submissions